New-coin research report · By CoinNudge Research · · Guide updated 2026-10-03 · 15 min read
What is Gno.land (GNOT) coin, and is it worth holding?
Gno.land (GNOT) is a new mainnet native token. GNOT is a technically differentiated but very young network thesis. Its last complete 7-day provider return was +33.9% versus BTC +4.0%. Only 10 matched daily marks are available here; this is not a proven long-term holding advantage or a personal buy call.
Inspect the original price observations · Check the new-coin watchlist
What should a GNOT investor know first?
- GNOT changed +33.9% over the last complete 7-day provider window versus BTC +4.0%.
- 10 comparable daily observations; 30-day returns and long-run hit rates are not inferred when unavailable.
- GNOT is a technically differentiated but very young network thesis. A conditional hold needs verified real usage and a clear circulating/locked supply reconciliation; ten comparable daily prices cannot estimate a durable success probability.
What is Gno.land's native GNOT, and is it an ERC-20 token?
GNOT is the native asset of Gno.land. Its mainnet launched on 12 September 2026 and KuCoin opened spot trading four days later. Official documentation identifies GNOT for transaction fees and storage deposits; that establishes a technical use, not already-proven application demand.
Identity comes first: Native Gno.land mainnet asset on gnoland-1; not an ERC-20 contract. The relevant market event is KuCoin spot, 2026-09-16 14:00 UTC. Match the asset and the trading route before combining prices, documents or wallet instructions; a same-name token is outside this report.
| New-coin identity | Verified or dated evidence | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|
| Asset category | New mainnet native token | A category is not a holder return |
| Listing | KuCoin spot, 2026-09-16 14:00 UTC | Listing date is not necessarily token creation date |
| Chain and contract | Native Gno.land mainnet asset on gnoland-1; not an ERC-20 contract | Check identity before using any price series |
| Market-price history | 10 matched daily observations from 2026-09-17 to 2026-09-26 | Too short for a long-cycle probability claim |
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
How do GNOT gas and storage deposits create different kinds of demand?
GNOT pays gas and can be locked for persistent storage; those are different demand channels, neither a guaranteed yield for passive holders. Gno.land's official storage documentation says deleting state can release a deposit while gas is not refunded. A refundable lock can be reversed, so it should not be described as a permanent token burn. The Go-based language and realms describe how applications are built, not how many paying applications already exist.
The falsifiable question is whether a token-specific benefit or measurable demand exists. Product adoption, community size, exchange listing and tokenholder economic rights are four different claims; this report does not merge them. Revisit this section if dated primary documents or usage records change.
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
Does GNOT's 7-day rally establish a durable holding advantage?
No durable holding advantage follows from this short rally. Using the same CoinGecko 00:00 UTC USD marks for GNOT and BTC, GNOT moved +33.9% over the most recent complete 7-day window, versus BTC +4.0%. Across the full 10-observation provider path, it moved +30.0%, versus BTC +10.4% on the same dates. These are descriptive USD reference-price changes, not achievable net returns.
Provider observations can predate the specific exchange listing named above and may aggregate other venues. This full observed path is not a claim about returns after buying on that exchange's listing day. The worst observed one-day close-to-close change was −15.7% on 2026-09-20; the maximum daily-mark peak-to-trough drawdown was −25.0%. A reader could have faced worse intraday conditions, fees and slippage. A 30-day return is deliberately left blank when the provider has fewer than 31 complete daily marks.
| Matched price window | GNOT USD change | BTC USD change | UTC start / reason missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +33.9% | +4.0% | 2026-09-19 |
| 14 days | Insufficient complete days | — | No matched start |
| 30 days | Insufficient complete days | — | No matched start |
| Full observed span | +30.0% | +10.4% | 2026-09-17 → 2026-09-26 |
Verify: Complete daily data · Original CoinGecko price response
Does owning GNOT give you network income or GovDAO control?
GNOT ownership does not by itself establish passive network income or unrestricted GovDAO control. GNOT pays for network interactions and storage deposits under documented rules, but it is not ownership of NewTendermint. Governance parameters follow GovDAO's rules, not an assumed corporate one-token-one-vote right for every balance.
Do not infer a company share, revenue distribution or guaranteed airdrop from ticker ownership. Where a benefit depends on staking, eligibility, an application or a later company event, those conditions must be evaluated separately.
For a holding decision, separate a spendable native balance from a realm's storage deposit and from authority to change governance parameters. The official storage guide tracks deposits at realm level rather than as a simple personal savings account; refund behavior depends on the application's rules. Verify the specific realm and effective governance procedure instead of calculating a passive APY from token ownership.
| Question | Current finding | Verification boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Transferable token? | Native Gno.land mainnet asset on gnoland-1; not an ERC-20 contract | Verify chain and exact contract or native asset |
| Product or holder rights | GNOT pays for network interactions and storage deposits under documented rules. Owning GNOT is not ownership of NewTendermint. Governance parameters are handled by GovDAO; this page does not infer that every GNOT balance receives an unrestricted one-token-one-vote corporate right. | Read primary terms; conditions can change |
| Company equity? | No direct equity right verified | Do not equate token with ordinary shares |
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing · Gno.land storage deposit and refund rules
How should a GNOT buyer check the native-network transfer route?
Use the native Gno.land network identity and the receiving venue's currently supported deposit route; do not treat GNOT as an arbitrary Ethereum token because an unrelated contract shares the ticker. The frozen profile identifies gnoland-1 and the KuCoin listing, but neither certifies that deposits, withdrawals or constitutional transfer rules are unchanged today.
Before moving funds, reconcile the network selected by both sender and receiver, the required destination fields, the venue's deposit status and the currently effective transfer restriction. Stop if any instruction conflicts. A small permitted test transfer can help validate a route, but it does not prove that an exchange balance grants GovDAO participation or can bypass native restrictions.
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
What would show GNOT demand continuing after storage is refunded?
Recurring application activity and net storage kept locked would be stronger evidence than a launch-day transaction count. Record new deposits, refunds and remaining deposit stock separately, alongside gas-paid interactions. A deposit stock can rise because data remains stored, while turnover in refunds can release tokens; neither series is the same as a passive holder dividend.
Start with a dated realm-level record and explain who can add or delete state, then track the same definitions over successive periods. If activity is reward-driven, disappears after launch or cannot be separated from treasury transfers, the durable-demand claim remains unverified. This edition supplies a ten-mark price comparison, not that operating series; its +33.9% recent 7-day move cannot fill the evidence gap.
Verify: Gno.land storage-deposit accounting · Frozen GNOT price and source metadata
How do GNOT circulating supply and transfer restrictions affect usable float?
Reported GNOT supply is not the same as a transferable balance or exchange-available float. The gap between roughly 197 million provider-reported circulating and 1.333 billion total/max does not date a release. The cited Gno documentation describes initially transfer-locked mainnet balances under Constitution §126; check the currently effective rule, deposits and custody before assuming a particular balance is sellable.
At 2026-09-26T09:38:20.000Z, CoinGecko reports 197,320,000 circulating, 1,333,000,000 total and 1,333,000,000 maximum GNOT. Their differences are useful questions, not a dated sell-volume forecast. Provider-defined circulation may differ from actual immediately executable float.
| GNOT supply field | Provider snapshot | Investor interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Circulating | 197,320,000 | Provider-estimated current float |
| Total | 1,333,000,000 | May include locked or restricted tokens |
| Maximum | 1,333,000,000 | Not a vesting schedule |
| Circulating / maximum | 14.8% | Does not identify a next unlock date |
Verify: Frozen CoinGecko supply source · Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
How do GNOT tokenomics distinguish gas, refundable storage and transferable supply?
GNOT pays network gas and can fund a releasable storage deposit under the cited Gno.land mechanism. Deposits are tracked by realm, not by depositor: someone who removes state can receive released GNOT under that realm’s rules, so the original payer is not guaranteed a refund. Gas fees are not refunded. Provider total-minus-circulating supply is not a dated release schedule.
Verify currently effective constitutional transfer rules, custody, paid realm activity and storage deposits released as well as locked. Then compare balances with executable exit depth. Genesis restrictions and a mainnet announcement alone cannot establish what a holder can transfer today or how much durable demand exists.
| Token-economics dimension | Documented mechanism or attributed claim | What remains unproven / investor implication |
|---|---|---|
| Supply | The dated provider snapshot reports roughly 197 million circulating against 1.333 billion total/maximum. | The difference is not a verified dated unlock calendar; provider definitions need on-chain reconciliation. |
| Transfer and release | Official Gno.land documentation says genesis balances were initially subject to transfer restrictions under the network constitution. | Check the currently effective constitutional rule and exchange custody before treating a balance as tradable. |
| Use and rights | GNOT pays gas and can be locked as a refundable storage deposit; GovDAO governs storage-pricing parameters. | A refundable storage lock is not a token burn, corporate equity or guaranteed yield. |
| Investor check | Measure live realm activity, storage locked and released, transfer restrictions and actual bid depth. | Mainnet launch alone does not establish durable fee demand. |
Verify: Gno.land network and transfer rules · Gno.land storage-deposit mechanism
Can a GNOT exchange quote be converted into a reliable exit?
Not without route and current order-book checks. CoinGecko reports $3,317,722 24-hour aggregated turnover at 2026-09-26T09:38:20.000Z. That is turnover across reported markets, not cash resting within 1% of the best bid and not guaranteed fill size. KuCoin spot, 2026-09-16 14:00 UTC confirms one venue and pair, not all venues or your jurisdiction.
This release does not have a same-time, validated order-book-depth series for this token. Therefore spread, executable $10,000 depth and expected slippage are explicitly unknown. Before any decision, check the exact pair, bid/ask ladder, deposit/withdrawal status and the size you actually intend to trade.
| Liquidity check | Dated observation | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Aggregated reported 24h turnover | $3,317,722 | Not venue-specific executable depth |
| Known exchange event | KuCoin spot, 2026-09-16 14:00 UTC | Availability depends on region and account |
| Live spread and ±1% depth | Not measured in this release | Must check a current venue book |
| Order-size slippage | Not measured in this release | Cannot be inferred from 24h turnover |
Verify: Frozen market response · Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
What developer activity would support a Gno.land investment thesis?
Developer participation is more diagnostic than ticker chatter: inspect actual packages, realms, updates, bug reports and discussion around storage pricing. A social spike after KuCoin listing is not evidence that the new chain has durable application usage.
No bot-filtered, contract-matched social time series is available for this release. We therefore do not print a fabricated “community score” or treat post counts as unique buyers. Future updates should freeze source, query, period, duplicate filtering and examples of substantive discussion.
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
Who can change Gno.land storage pricing and transfer rules?
Gno documentation describes GovDAO oversight of global storage price. The actual voting and constitutional process should be read in its own rules, and exchange-held balances do not necessarily confer direct proposal control. This is network governance, not company equity.
Separate formal binding controls from a social vote, an exchange listing process and project marketing. A governance claim should name the proposer, voting eligibility, executable contract or organization, timelock and appeal/correction path.
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing
What would justify holding GNOT beyond its launch rally?
GNOT is a technically differentiated but very young network thesis. A conditional hold needs verified real usage and a clear circulating/locked supply reconciliation; ten comparable daily prices cannot estimate a durable success probability.
What would strengthen the thesis: Developer deployments, recurring fee-paid usage and storage deposits rise while transfer/issuance rules and execution venues become clearer. What would weaken or invalidate it: Usage remains launch-driven, governance or transfer constraints surprise holders, or thin order books turn quoted price into a poor exit estimate.
The historical price evidence contains only 10 matched daily observations from 2026-09-17 to 2026-09-26; it cannot estimate a stable win probability, long-run expected return or suitable position size. Set an investment horizon, maximum loss and next evidence review before calling GNOT a long-term hold.
| Hold-decision test | Condition to check | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|
| Asset identity | Native Gno.land mainnet asset on gnoland-1; not an ERC-20 contract | Wrong same-name token or chain |
| Token-specific value | GNOT pays for network interactions and storage deposits under documented rules. Owning GNOT is not ownership of NewTendermint. Governance parameters are handled by GovDAO; this page does not infer that every GNOT balance receives an unrestricted one-token-one-vote corporate right. | Project popularity does not accrue to holders |
| Supply and control | The provider snapshot reports about 197 million circulating against 1.333 billion total/max. These are provider fields, not an official release timetable. Gno docs also note mainnet balances were initially transfer-locked under Constitution §126. Reconcile exchange deposits, custody and transfer status before assuming all listed total supply can be sold. | Unexpected tradable float or concentrated control |
| Exit feasibility | Current book depth for intended order | Reference price cannot be executed |
| Thesis invalidation | Usage remains launch-driven, governance or transfer constraints surprise holders, or thin order books turn quoted price into a poor exit estimate. | Indefinite hold without a test |
Verify: Frozen GNOT calculation and complete observations · Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits
Can you check all ten matched GNOT daily observations?
Yes. The 10 matched 00:00 UTC observations below include each reported provider price, 24-hour provider volume and same-date BTC reference. The first row has no previous-day change; it is not a zero-return day.
This is one short, overlapping historical path. Do not count each daily row as an independent investment experiment or interpret a missing 30-day comparison as 0%.
| UTC day | GNOT daily change | GNOT USD price | Provider 24h turnover | BTC USD price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 | First observation | $0.0612792 | $4,919,518 | $76,147 |
| 2026-09-18 | +9.2% | $0.0669373 | $8,614,534 | $76,371 |
| 2026-09-19 | −11.1% | $0.0595255 | $8,730,284 | $80,874 |
| 2026-09-20 | −15.7% | $0.0501847 | $8,309,875 | $81,236 |
| 2026-09-21 | +29.8% | $0.0651198 | $7,881,716 | $81,169 |
| 2026-09-22 | +0.5% | $0.0654618 | $7,539,777 | $86,597 |
| 2026-09-23 | −5.2% | $0.0620467 | $7,781,607 | $86,183 |
| 2026-09-24 | +47.3% | $0.0913707 | $9,172,398 | $84,382 |
| 2026-09-25 | +0.6% | $0.0919347 | $3,590,142 | $84,378 |
| 2026-09-26 | −13.3% | $0.0796934 | $3,600,786 | $84,076 |
Verify: All observations CSV
How was the short GNOT history compared with Bitcoin?
GNOT was compared with BTC on the same ten matched daily marks, with incomplete windows left unavailable; those short-history observations do not estimate a long-term holding probability. Research calculation version new-coin-provider-path-1.0; generated 2026-09-26T09:40:07.870555+00:00. Price and BTC comparison use CoinGecko market-chart 00:00 UTC USD observations, aligned by exact UTC day; the final intraday quote was excluded. Returns equal end/start − 1; path drawdown uses the maximum earlier observed daily mark. The full 10-observation span is clearly labelled and is not mislabeled as 30 days.
The original provider response is frozen and hashed SHA-256 1f03d377590b895d597fb55922f736ec148e86096c1c2f26c03b04ef0a53dafd. The JSON and CSV allow independent recalculation. Supply/turnover are separate dated CoinGecko snapshot fields at 2026-09-26T09:38:20.000Z, not information known at the first chart date. Official project/exchange documents support identity and intended rights; issuer assertions are marked as such. No causal link between social activity and later returns is claimed.
| Reproducible evidence | Download | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Calculation JSON | /research-data/new-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/gnot.json | Version, summaries, full observations and hash |
| Daily rows | /research-data/new-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/gnot-daily.csv | Matched provider prices and turnover |
| Original price response | /research-data/new-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/gnot-coingecko-source.json | CoinGecko input, not PIT live archive |
| Original market response | /research-data/new-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/coingecko-market-source.json | Dated supply and volume snapshot |
Verify: Gno.land official network status · Gno.land GNOT storage deposits · KuCoin official GNOT listing · Dated CoinGecko market chart response · Dated CoinGecko supply and market response · Full research JSON · Matched daily observation CSV
Take the next step with this evidence.
Choose ongoing Telegram monitoring or inspect structured data in your own research workflow.
Receive qualifying events in Telegram.
Use the ready-made alert checklist, message explanations and daily briefing. Check the supported categories and coins before subscribing; every Research page is not a separate alert category.
Check the alert list · View alert plans
Inspect the data before choosing a pack.
Prepared research packs supply scoped features, separate outcomes where available and quality flags. Buy a fixed edition once and download directly; API use is optional.
Check data pack samples · Explore the full data catalog · Compare data plans
Each purchased pack includes its specified fields and published date range. This page's full dataset is not automatically included. Other data families require coverage, date, field and source-use confirmation before purchase. Telegram Pro is a separate 30-day service; historical packs are one-time purchases.
Frequently asked questions
What is Gno.land (GNOT) coin?
GNOT is the native asset of Gno.land. Its mainnet launched on 12 September 2026 and KuCoin opened spot trading four days later. Official documentation identifies GNOT for transaction fees and storage deposits; that establishes a technical use, not already-proven application demand.
Is GNOT worth holding?
GNOT is a technically differentiated but very young network thesis. A conditional hold needs verified real usage and a clear circulating/locked supply reconciliation; ten comparable daily prices cannot estimate a durable success probability.
Is GNOT a good coin to buy now?
No unconditional buy answer follows from 10 daily observations. Check exact asset identity, documented rights, supply control, current depth and your own maximum loss.
How much did GNOT grow over 7, 14 and 30 days?
The 7-day matched provider return was +33.9%. A complete 14-day mark is unavailable. A full 30-day return is unavailable in this frozen release; the page shows the complete shorter path instead.
Does GNOT have governance rights?
Gno documentation describes GovDAO oversight of global storage price. The actual voting and constitutional process should be read in its own rules, and exchange-held balances do not necessarily confer direct proposal control. This is network governance, not company equity.
Can I reproduce the GNOT chart?
Yes. Download the frozen CoinGecko input, 10 matched UTC daily rows and versioned calculation JSON linked in the method section.
What are GNOT tokenomics?
GNOT is a new network asset used for gas and releasable storage deposits. Deposits are tracked by realm; a state-removing user can receive released funds, so the original payer is not guaranteed a refund. Gas fees are not refunded. Provider supply fields do not establish a dated unlock calendar. Current constitutional transfer rules and actual usage need verification.
Sources and verification
Track GNOT only after checking live liquidity and your own risk limit.
Use the token report for the evidence boundary, then verify current market conditions or alert coverage separately.
Explore Telegram alert coverage