CoinNudge
Loading market workspace

New-listing research · By CoinNudge Research · · Guide updated 2026-09-17 · 32 min read

Top 20 New Crypto Listings to Watch

Quick answer

DGAI, CNPY and KII lead this edition’s watchlist. We screened 305 recent official announcements, found 44 data-qualified unique assets and ranked the top 20. Only 8/20 currently have both a positive weekly return and a close above SMA7; 12 remain recovery watches. “New” means recently announced on a covered venue—not necessarily newly created. Stars express relative research priority, not profit odds. These are technical ranks, not fundamental endorsements. Each coin now has a separate project, token-utility, supply, adoption and risk review; material disclosure conflicts and missing evidence are visible.

Preview alert list · Explore research data · See alert plans

Key points

  • 44 scored unique assets; 20 displayed, with all exclusions downloadable.
  • 8 trend-supported and 12 recovery observations—not 20 buy instructions.
  • Seven-day scoring is comparable across venues; the announcement discovery window is 90 days.
  • Reported volume and snapshot depth are limited evidence; contract and supply risks need separate review.
  • Fundamental evidence is separate from technical stars; issuer claims, disclosure conflicts and missing checks remain explicit.

Top 20 recent crypto listings: evidence before entry

8 of these 20 currently combine a positive seven-day return with a close above SMA7. The other 12 are recovery observations. A place on this list means research priority, not that the coin is ready to buy.

Observation labels: Priority watch means a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7 after the shared data, turnover and spread gates. Awaiting confirmation means at least one of those trend conditions is missing. These labels describe this edition’s observation state, not a buy signal, safety grade or change to the score.

Headline stars compare all 44 data-qualified coins in this edition. Raw scores remain visible. Neither number estimates profit probability. Sort uses unrounded raw scores; ties use venue then pair.

RankCoin · selected spot venueRelative rating · not profit odds7-day returnRaw score · decision context
1Priority watchDGAI · MEXCRelative rating9.8 / 10+21.14%9.66/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
2Priority watchCNPY · MEXCRelative rating9.5 / 10+84.65%8.65/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
3Priority watchKII · MEXCRelative rating9.3 / 10+4.13%8.23/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
4Priority watchCASHCAT · MEXCRelative rating9.1 / 10+10.15%7.62/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
5Awaiting confirmationAERO · BinanceRelative rating8.9 / 10-0.83%7.61/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
6Priority watchCATE · MEXCRelative rating8.6 / 10+41.90%7.40/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
7Awaiting confirmation牛来 · MEXCRelative rating8.4 / 10+27.41%7.07/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
8Priority watchNES · MEXCRelative rating8.2 / 10+41.67%6.99/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
9Priority watchCAP · MEXCRelative rating8.0 / 10+26.78%6.69/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
10Awaiting confirmationGRVT · MEXCRelative rating7.7 / 10+4.55%6.62/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
11Awaiting confirmationDOS · MEXCRelative rating7.5 / 10-3.92%6.39/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
12Priority watchDELTA · MEXCRelative rating7.3 / 10+29.29%6.35/10 · Trend supported; monitor entry conditions
13Awaiting confirmationAIINU · MEXCRelative rating7.0 / 10+28.89%6.11/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
14Awaiting confirmationSTONK · MEXCRelative rating6.8 / 10+8.66%6.04/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
15Awaiting confirmationMARSCOIN · BinanceRelative rating6.6 / 10-14.18%5.98/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
16Awaiting confirmationPONS · MEXCRelative rating6.4 / 10-15.67%5.79/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
17Awaiting confirmationHOODRAT · MEXCRelative rating6.1 / 10+32.99%5.03/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
18Awaiting confirmationPIPEDOG · MEXCRelative rating5.9 / 10-2.70%5.02/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
19Awaiting confirmationALIGN · MEXCRelative rating5.7 / 10-4.81%4.99/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair
20Awaiting confirmationFONE · MEXCRelative rating5.5 / 10-6.21%4.89/10 · Recovery watch; wait for trend repair

Does technical strength have fundamental support?

The order and stars remain technical-only. None of these 20 has received a full fundamental investment endorsement. Priority watch describes price conditions, not project quality; read the separate fundamental verdict before acting.

The evidence changes how the leaders should be interpreted: DGAI has inconsistent team-vesting descriptions across reviewed issuer papers; CNPY has unreconciled supply figures across listing and project documentation. KII has a documented gas/staking role, while GRVT membership explicitly carries no revenue entitlement. These are material distinctions that price charts cannot show.

Meme-led entries need a different lens: CASHCAT is described as entertainment-first; several Meme+ entries lack enough verified utility, supply or security evidence for a fundamental case. MARSCOIN’s tokenized-stock-related pairing is not verified equity ownership. A high technical rank never overrides these caveats.

Fundamental sources reviewed 2026-09-17T16:09:50.235942Z. Source statements, CoinNudge interpretation and unverified gaps are separated in each profile. Reported total supply is not verified circulating supply. We have not reconstructed a common-date market-cap/FDV table, audited customer revenue, tested contract control or independently checked all team identities. No missing value is treated as zero risk.

Verify: Download all 20 fundamental profiles · Fundamental review checksum

Which new crypto is worth watching—and when should you wait?

Start with trend-supported names, then inspect turnover, spread and actual order depth. A positive weekly return with a close below SMA7 signals that the recent gain may already be fading. Recovery rows require fresh confirmation; their rank is not an instruction to catch a falling price.

DGAI leads on reported activity, positive momentum and a comparatively shallow weekly closing drawdown. CNPY has stronger price momentum but a larger chasing risk. KII contributes a steadier activity-and-trend combination. These are market observations; issuer quality, token concentration, unlocks and contract safety have not been verified by the score.

Before any trade, confirm the exact token contract and venue, current spread and size available near your price, upcoming unlocks, withdrawal status and whether the market still meets the published conditions. Do not transfer tokens based on a ticker alone.

What counts as a new listing in this study?

We inspected 305 unique official announcements in the 90 days before 2026-09-17T00:00:00Z. Eligible records must resolve to an active native-crypto USDT spot market. The dated source announcement defines venue recency, not token creation, first-ever trading or a guaranteed opening time.

There are 45 market-level passes and 44 unique assets after cross-venue identity checks. The selected list has 2 Binance and 18 MEXC primary markets. No exchange quota is imposed. The source discovery window is 90 days; every score uses the same seven-day measurement window.

AERO is a newly added Binance venue market, not a claim that Aerodrome is a newly invented project. Meme+ announcements are included only when a matching active public USDT spot market and sufficient daily history exist; the source label remains visible. Ambiguous or unavailable markets are excluded.

MARSCOIN appears on both venues. The shared official BSC contract resolves that overlap; the higher seven-day median-turnover market supplies the score. We never add both venues into one return series or let one coin occupy two ranks. Other ticker collisions require separate identity review.

Final announcement dispositionCount
7d_median_turnover_below_50k4
current_spread_above_100bps48
duplicate_market_announcement2
eligible primary market44
fewer_than_8_completed_post_listing_days21
no_active_public_usdt_spot_market53
not_new_native_spot_listing87
not_new_spot_listing_announcement43
same_asset_secondary_venue1
unresolved_or_excluded_asset2

Verify: Full source and exclusion ledger

How the seven-day model and ten-star ratings work

Admission requires at least eight consecutive complete daily bars after the first observed trading day, valid positive OHLCV, a final closed bar at the cutoff, seven-day median quote turnover of at least 50,000 USDT and an observed spread no greater than 100 basis points. These are modest operational gates, not a liquidity or safety certification.

Let C be the latest closed daily price; R7=C/C[-8]−1. SMA7 and SMA8 average the final seven and eight closes. MDD7 is maximum peak-to-trough closing drawdown over those eight closes. BTC uses the same closing dates. clip(x)=min(1,max(0,x)). Turnover is exchange-reported quote volume, not verified net inflow or proof against wash trading.

Weighted components below are reduced by min(1,max(0,C/SMA7−1−0.20)/0.50). Raw scores are floored at zero. Relative stars = 10 × count of strictly lower raw scores / all scored unique assets. Exact ties share stars. Round only for display. This short-history model differs from our mature-market model; do not compare their raw scores as if they were the same instrument.

The model has not been validated on an untouched future sample. Short-window trend, return and drawdown are correlated evidence. No historical win rate, expected return or independent confirmation count is inferred.

ComponentWeight0–10 formula
Reported turnover30%10 × clip(log10(median7Quote / 50,000) / 2)
Closing drawdown25%10 × clip(1 − MDD7 / 0.70)
Short trend20%10 × [0.5 I(C>SMA7) + 0.5 I(SMA7>SMA8)]
BTC-relative return15%10 × clip(0.5 + (R7−BTC_R7)/0.60)
Sustained activity10%10 × count(last 7 days quote turnover ≥50,000)/7

Verify: Scoring implementation · All 44 component scores

#1 DGAI: High reported turnover with a shallow weekly drawdown

Priority watch
DGAI daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Supply disclosures need reconciliation. Technical strength is worth tracking, but reconcile the team schedule and verify paid workload receipts before making a fundamental allocation case. Prefer evidence of fees relative to token rewards over participant counts.

Relative rating 9.8/10; raw model fit 9.66/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +21.14% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +23.82 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.9174 USDT; SMA7 0.76838571; SMA8 0.767. Seven-day closing drawdown was 5.07%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 18,279,324 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:39.459138Z, spread was 5.36 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 19,959/25,231 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-21T05:51:30Z. The chart contains 23 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productDGrid AI describes a distributed marketplace and routing network for AI inference and agents. The research thesis is cheaper, verifiable access to compute—not simply exposure to the AI narrative.
Token demand and value captureIssuer documents propose DGAI payments for inference, node collateral and protocol voting. Demand depends on paying workloads; airdrop participation is not evidence of recurring customer demand.
Supply, dilution and unlocksBoth reviewed issuer documents state a 1 billion supply. The litepaper allocates 50% to nodes and 20% to community rewards. Its team vesting description is two-year linear; the MiCAR paper instead states a one-year cliff followed by two-year linear vesting. These descriptions have not been reconciled to deployed contracts; no precise next unlock is asserted.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe project publishes an Arena participation interface and technical documentation. We have not verified paid inference revenue, recurring customers or live node decentralization. Points and rewards can subsidize activity.
Team, control and security gapsA regulatory-format whitepaper is an issuer disclosure, not a regulator endorsement or a smart-contract audit. Current administrator powers and effective vesting contracts remain unverified in this review.

Verify: Official listing announcement · DGrid litepaper · DGrid MiCAR disclosure · DGrid Arena

#2 CNPY: Strong weekly momentum, with chasing risk

Priority watch
CNPY daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Supply disclosures need reconciliation. Monitor production app usage and fee demand, while resolving the supply mismatch before valuation. A strong price advance does not resolve inconsistent economic disclosures.

Relative rating 9.5/10; raw model fit 8.65/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +84.65% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +87.33 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.3909 USDT; SMA7 0.28777143; SMA8 0.2782625. Seven-day closing drawdown was 6.48%. The extension deduction is 0.32 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 1,455,612 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:45.094414Z, spread was 33.41 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 756/3,417 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-09-04T06:52:11Z. The chart contains 9 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productCanopy offers infrastructure for sovereign appchains and AI-assisted application development. The key question is whether independent applications repeatedly use its security and deployment services.
Token demand and value captureProject economics describe CNPY transaction fees and validator staking for nested chains. That creates a potential usage link, but deployment counts alone do not show how much demand reaches the token.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe MEXC listing states 560 million total tokens; the reviewed Canopy economics page projects 504 million under block rewards and halvings. The source vintage, native-versus-wrapped scope and current policy need reconciliation. We do not select one as verified circulating supply or publish an FDV from it.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe project site advertises mainnet and separately labels its user/developer counters as testnet metrics. Those counters must not be interpreted as paying mainnet users; an independent retention and fee series was not verified.
Team, control and security gapsConsensus, validator concentration and bridge/wrapped-token arrangements need their own review. A BSC listing contract is not proof that all native-chain economic claims apply unchanged.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Canopy product site · Canopy economics

#3 KII: Steady gains backed by sustained trading activity

Priority watch
KII daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Token mechanism documented; adoption unverified. The utility thesis is clearer than a pure meme narrative. Validate recurring settlement demand and supply releases against actual usage; do not substitute exchange turnover for network adoption.

Relative rating 9.3/10; raw model fit 8.23/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +4.13% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +6.82 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.08438 USDT; SMA7 0.080595714; SMA8 0.08065. Seven-day closing drawdown was 5.43%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 8,195,128 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:37.593028Z, spread was 3.64 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 706/408 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-11T07:07:42Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productKiiChain targets stablecoin foreign exchange, settlement and financial infrastructure for emerging markets. The commercial question is sustained payment and FX demand rather than an RWA label alone.
Token demand and value captureKII is described as the network gas, staking and governance asset. Some application benefits require eligible active participation; simply holding KII does not automatically earn trading rewards.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe project specifies 1.8 billion maximum supply. Investors hold 14.15%, with a 12-month cliff then 24-month vesting; the 9.5% team allocation has a two-year cliff then two-year vesting. Community releases follow separate schedules. These are issuer terms, not an on-chain reconciliation or a dated next-unlock calculation.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsDocumentation establishes the intended economic mechanism. This review does not verify customer payment volume, net protocol fees or the share of usage independent of incentives.
Team, control and security gapsCross-chain connectivity and FX/oracle dependencies add risks beyond the token contract. Fixed maximum supply does not eliminate dilution from already allocated but not circulating tokens.

Verify: Official listing announcement · KiiChain tokenomics · KII utility

#4 CASHCAT: Positive trend with a contained closing pullback

Priority watch
CASHCAT daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Meme narrative; no verified economic utility. Its current trend can justify price monitoring, but not a fundamentals-based recommendation. Require holder distribution, transfer-permission and liquidity-lock checks before any stronger claim.

Relative rating 9.1/10; raw model fit 7.62/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +10.15% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +12.83 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.18439 USDT; SMA7 0.16691429; SMA8 0.166975. Seven-day closing drawdown was 7.65%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 1,773,753 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:33.460310Z, spread was 26.81 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 3,650/2,666 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-08T12:26:10Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productCash Cat is described by listing sources as a Robinhood Chain meme token. The LBank introduction explicitly characterizes it as entertainment-first and unaffiliated with Robinhood Markets.
Token demand and value captureNo productive token use or revenue entitlement was established. A chain name and mascot narrative are not ownership of, or sponsorship by, the company sharing that name.
Supply, dilution and unlocksMEXC states 1 billion total. We have not reconciled circulating tokens, administrator powers or concentration. Website claims about pool liquidity or taxes are not independently verified lock or supply evidence.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsMultiple listings establish trading availability, not product-market fit. Community participation and exchange volume do not demonstrate fee-paying business customers.
Team, control and security gapsThe reviewed CertiK project page lists audits as unavailable. A monitoring score or verified-contract badge must not be described as a completed security audit.

Verify: Official listing announcement · LBank project introduction · CertiK audit availability

#5 AERO: Liquid venue addition, but the weekly trend still needs repair

Awaiting confirmation
AERO daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on Binance
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Fee mechanism documented; valuation not established. Compare actual fee income with emissions and incentive spending before valuation. The present negative weekly return still warrants the technical waiting label despite a more developed product thesis.

Relative rating 8.9/10; raw model fit 7.61/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -0.83% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +1.85 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.5491 USDT; SMA7 0.554; SMA8 0.5539625. Seven-day closing drawdown was 7.76%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 2,650,438 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:34.780427Z, spread was 3.36 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 38,296/31,112 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: Binance announcement published 2026-07-17T07:30:01.964000Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productAerodrome is a Base liquidity and exchange protocol. This is a newly covered Binance venue market, not a newly launched project. Its fundamental research question is durable trading-fee generation.
Token demand and value captureAERO rewards liquidity providers; locking into veAERO enables voting and associated fee/incentive participation under protocol rules. Buying liquid AERO alone is not equivalent to holding a fee-producing locked position.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe official disclosure describes recurring emissions and governance-linked incentive allocation. We do not treat the token as a fixed-cap asset or infer current circulating supply from an old initial allocation.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsA documented fee-distribution mechanism is stronger evidence than an unspecified future utility. Current revenue, incentive-adjusted organic volume and sustainable yield were not independently measured for this edition.
Team, control and security gapsLocking introduces duration and governance exposure; liquidity incentives and external voting incentives can distort headline activity. Smart-contract and Base dependency risks remain.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Aerodrome official disclosure · Aerodrome documentation

#6 CATE: Strong rebound with a substantial pullback risk

Priority watch
CATE daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 8.6/10; raw model fit 7.40/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +41.90% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +44.58 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.07819 USDT; SMA7 0.059062857; SMA8 0.05856775. Seven-day closing drawdown was 22.06%. The extension deduction is 0.25 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 453,857 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:35.578475Z, spread was 38.10 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 4/128 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-27T05:32:46Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identitySOL · Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump
Project / productThe contract-matched project page presents a cat-themed browser game. A playable game is a product surface, but does not establish paid demand for CATE or a claim on game revenue.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsA game score is not an on-chain token balance. Check whether any economic use is actually required by the game, plus mint/freeze authority and liquidity concentration.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Contract-matched project page

#7 牛来: Weekly gains have not secured the short-term trend

Awaiting confirmation
牛来 daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Security review needed. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 8.4/10; raw model fit 7.07/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +27.41% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +30.09 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.100094 USDT; SMA7 0.120298; SMA8 0.11508087. Seven-day closing drawdown was 25.82%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 1,069,669 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:38.585769Z, spread was 12.06 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 7,748/7,005 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-15T11:00:30Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identityBSC · 0xBEEA1D618e533a387D941F58a7d4c9b7bD377777
Project / productThe verified listing places this contract in Meme+. We did not establish a contract-matched product, enforceable token utility or independently measured business activity.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsContract-level sellability and administrator permissions have not been reproduced by us. An external contract-specific exit warning was found; it remains unverified in this review and is not proof that every venue trade is blocked. Require a current independent contract review before stronger claims.

Verify: Official listing announcement · External warning — not independently reproduced

#8 NES: Price strength meets a thin-turnover constraint

Priority watch
NES daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Utility described; production demand unverified. Require reproducible inference receipts, current network status and economic demand. Its thin observed exchange activity compounds the uncertainty around adoption.

Relative rating 8.2/10; raw model fit 6.99/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +41.67% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +44.35 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.1632 USDT; SMA7 0.15593571; SMA8 0.15084375. Seven-day closing drawdown was 5.31%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 65,489 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:32.170666Z, spread was 27.55 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 90/131 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-06-23T09:27:16Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productNesa describes a network for private and verifiable AI inference. Its differentiator must be tested through working inference, verification and cost—not just a claim to host many models.
Token demand and value captureThe project says NES pays for inference/queryspace, compensates model and node operators, and supports network security. Actual token demand depends on repeated paid use rather than subsidized demonstrations.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe venue announcement states 1 billion NES. A current independently reconciled circulating supply, allocation-wallet map and dated vesting schedule were not established; missing unlock information does not mean no unlocks.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe reviewed site links a playground and labels a testnet. Model listings and illustrative prices do not establish paid production throughput or revenue. This review has not tested claimed privacy guarantees.
Team, control and security gapsVerify which inference operations use proofs or trusted hardware and what those checks actually protect. Team research claims and website partner logos are not independent security attestations.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Nesa product and token description · Nesa documentation

#9 CAP: Momentum qualifies, trading capacity remains limited

Priority watch
CAP daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Product thesis documented; token capture unclear. Research the underlying credit engine, but verify exactly how CAP benefits before treating platform growth as token value. Monitor collateral adequacy and realized defaults rather than advertised yield alone.

Relative rating 8.0/10; raw model fit 6.69/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +26.78% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +29.46 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.06013 USDT; SMA7 0.051955714; SMA8 0.05139. Seven-day closing drawdown was 11.09%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 58,420 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:32.206042Z, spread was 9.15 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 1,964/1,567 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-06-25T04:33:10Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productCap describes a credit and USD-yield platform connecting lenders, borrowers and collateral-backed underwriters. The relevant fundamental questions are credit quality, collateral coverage and realized losses.
Token demand and value captureThe product uses deposit instruments including cUSD; these are not the same asset as CAP. The reviewed material does not establish an enforceable CAP-holder claim on borrower interest or platform revenue.
Supply, dilution and unlocksMEXC states 10 billion CAP. Current circulating supply and an independently verified allocation/unlock schedule were not established, so neither a precise dilution forecast nor a fair-value multiple is supplied.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsPublic product and protocol documentation exists. We did not validate current loan-book size, net revenue or loss history; website counters and advertised yield are not used as audited fundamentals.
Team, control and security gapsUnderwriter collateral can be insufficient or slow to realize; smart-contract, oracle, stablecoin and borrower risks remain. Financial guarantees described by the project are not a guarantee to a CAP token buyer.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Cap platform · Cap protocol introduction · Cap lender mechanics

#10 GRVT: A small weekly gain without full trend confirmation

Awaiting confirmation
GRVT daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Membership utility documented; no revenue entitlement. Test whether fee savings create sustained membership demand. Do not pitch GRVT as a share of exchange profits, and distinguish shipped products from roadmap items.

Relative rating 7.7/10; raw model fit 6.62/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +4.55% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +7.23 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.1678 USDT; SMA7 0.17038571; SMA8 0.16915. Seven-day closing drawdown was 4.17%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 391,098 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:35.594692Z, spread was 11.53 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 7,554/7,694 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-27T06:30:20Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productGrvt combines trading, savings and investment access on a common balance. The product thesis is capital efficiency and user retention, with a documented operating platform rather than only a future exchange proposal.
Token demand and value captureThe July litepaper defines GRVT as a fee/access membership token, explicitly without equity or revenue/profit distributions. It also says membership does not confer preferential product yield or allocation; earlier promotional descriptions should not override this limitation.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe announced cap is 1 billion. The litepaper describes team/investor lockups and multi-year vesting, with some investor exceptions. Community distributions generally span 12 months but account schedules vary. We do not project all tokens using one airdrop schedule.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe live site exposes trading and product interfaces. Historical volume and wallet totals in issuer announcements are self-reported; organic retained users and audited net revenue were not independently established.
Team, control and security gapsThe litepaper names security reviewers, but this review does not verify their deployed-code coverage. Layer-2 settlement, withdrawals and jurisdictional restrictions require separate assessment.

Verify: Official listing announcement · GRVT July litepaper · GRVT TGE and release explanation · Initial token announcement

#11 DOS: Contained drawdown, but price is still retreating

Awaiting confirmation
DOS daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Product positioning visible; token capture unverified. Ask for the current DOS economic specification and measurable paid usage. Until product-to-token demand is documented, classify this as a technical observation with an unresolved fundamental thesis.

Relative rating 7.5/10; raw model fit 6.39/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -3.92% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of -1.24 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.19755 USDT; SMA7 0.20762571; SMA8 0.207375. Seven-day closing drawdown was 8.87%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 493,757 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:37.554384Z, spread was 24.66 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 2,795/2,421 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-09T14:00:59Z. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productThe current listing describes DAPPOS and its xBubble AI agent product. Older documentation emphasizes an intent-execution framework. Product evolution must be distinguished from evidence that a particular token receives economic value.
Token demand and value captureLegacy unified-account documentation supports payment in multiple mainstream tokens. That is not proof that DOS is indispensable, burned by usage or entitled to AI subscription revenue. Those links remain unverified here.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe venue states 1 billion DOS. We have not reconciled circulating supply, insider allocations or a current vesting schedule; exchange listing and total supply are insufficient to estimate sell pressure.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsProduct descriptions and documentation are available. Paying AI users, retention, execution fees and subsidy-adjusted revenue were not independently established in this review.
Team, control and security gapsAgent permissions, task execution and contract upgrades require evaluation. Historic investor or integration claims do not substitute for auditing the currently deployed product and token.

Verify: Official listing announcement · DAPPOS project site · Unified-account documentation

#12 DELTA: A sharp advance with an unstable price path

Priority watch
DELTA daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 7.3/10; raw model fit 6.35/10. Trend supported; monitor entry conditions. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +29.29% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +31.97 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.014519 USDT; SMA7 0.011381714; SMA8 0.01136275. Seven-day closing drawdown was 31.53%. The extension deduction is 0.15 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 130,859 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:40.748705Z, spread was 11.89 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 210/16 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-24T10:49:28Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 23 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What to monitor next: whether price remains above SMA7 while turnover persists and the spread remains acceptable. A loss of that trend alignment invalidates the present trend-supported description.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identityROBINHOOD · 0xe8ffd7e24187F72afB08d75B1bb13088A989a791
Project / productThe contract-matched launchpad page describes liquidity-pool staking and compounding. This is a publisher description, not verified evidence of sustainable yield or deployed audited strategies.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsInspect the deployed strategy, source of rewards and withdrawal controls. A staking promise can recycle emissions rather than generate external revenue.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Contract-matched launchpad listing

#13 AIINU: Positive weekly return, incomplete trend alignment

Awaiting confirmation
AIINU daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 7.0/10; raw model fit 6.11/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +28.89% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +31.57 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.263005 USDT; SMA7 0.26524186; SMA8 0.257593. Seven-day closing drawdown was 19.22%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 170,516 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:35.314209Z, spread was 61.63 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 168/10 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-23T06:29:08Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identityROBINHOOD · 0x2E8c31162b855A2ffa90F6F8634643Ad6F111e18
Project / productMEXC identifies a Meme+ market for this contract. The letters AI in a ticker do not establish an AI product, compute demand or audited earnings.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsDo not import utility claims from another AI ticker. Tokenized-asset pairing claims found elsewhere require direct issuer, contract and redemption verification before use.

Verify: Official listing announcement

#14 STONK: Active trading cannot erase a deep weekly drawdown

Awaiting confirmation
STONK daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 6.8/10; raw model fit 6.04/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +8.66% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +11.34 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.204454 USDT; SMA7 0.23044571; SMA8 0.22515963. Seven-day closing drawdown was 45.12%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 1,284,654 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:37.091290Z, spread was 31.32 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 327/359 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-05T06:31:12Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identitySOL · 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx
Project / productThis entry is the specified Solana Meme+ contract. A stock-themed name is not evidence of company shares, a backing portfolio or dividend rights.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsFocus on mint/freeze permissions, large-holder concentration and independently verifiable liquidity. Its deep weekly closing drawdown already warns against treating activity as fundamental strength.

Verify: Official listing announcement

#15 MARSCOIN: High activity, weak price action across the selected venue

Awaiting confirmation
MARSCOIN daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on Binance
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Complex backing claims; ownership rights unverified. Keep it in high-risk observation pending contract, reward and backing checks. Do not infer company affiliation, equity exposure or guaranteed rewards from its branding or trading pair.

Relative rating 6.6/10; raw model fit 5.98/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -14.18% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of -11.50 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.092 USDT; SMA7 0.10271429; SMA8 0.103275. Seven-day closing drawdown was 27.43%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 20,683,708 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:45.256054Z, spread was 8.78 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 38,199/30,083 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: Binance announcement published 2026-09-04T10:15:01.870000Z. The chart contains 12 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productThe matched BSC project markets a meme asset paired with SPCXB, a tokenized-stock-related asset. This is not the unrelated historical Marscoin project, nor proof that holders own shares in a company.
Token demand and value captureThe project describes a trading-tax-funded rewards vault and a link to SPCXB. Token pairing is different from legally enforceable redemption or ownership; no such holder right was independently established.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe site advertises 3% buy and sell taxes. Current effective on-chain transfer settings, circulating supply and concentration were not independently checked. These DEX tax claims must not be applied mechanically to Binance order-book trades.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsA project website and matching contract evidence exist. Reserve backing, custodial attestations, redemption terms and distributions to holders have not been verified.
Team, control and security gapsThere are layered token, collateral, intermediary and marketing-claim risks. The source’s backing language does not turn this into a verified tokenized-equity investment or a capital-protected asset.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Matched Marscoin project

#16 PONS: Turnover remains meaningful while price needs repair

Awaiting confirmation
PONS daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 6.4/10; raw model fit 5.79/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -15.67% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of -12.99 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.57444 USDT; SMA7 0.59348; SMA8 0.60444263. Seven-day closing drawdown was 19.82%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 2,603,165 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:34.100238Z, spread was 15.01 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 10,540/7,681 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-15T08:49:56Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identityROBINHOOD · 0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571
Project / productThe official listing establishes this Meme+ contract. A fully reviewed issuer specification connecting platform fees to this token was not established; automatically generated token pages are insufficient.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsValidate issuer-controlled fee contracts and actual distributions before using a launchpad-revenue thesis. A token listing alone does not confirm that token holders receive platform income.

Verify: Official listing announcement

#17 HOODRAT: Large gains accompanied by thin activity and drawdown

Awaiting confirmation
HOODRAT daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 6.1/10; raw model fit 5.03/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed +32.99% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of +35.68 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.0018909 USDT; SMA7 0.0021418571; SMA8 0.00205185. Seven-day closing drawdown was 33.70%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 71,815 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:33.679144Z, spread was 82.90 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 126/490 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-11T09:52:29Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identityROBINHOOD · 0x8e62F281f282686fCa6dCB39288069a93fC23F1c
Project / productThe contract-matched project site centers on a comic-inspired character and community imagery. Branding is evidence of a narrative, not proof of intellectual-property licensing or productive cash flow.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsVerify rights claims, holder concentration and liquidity controls. Do not infer author endorsement, company affiliation or financial backing from the character or chain name.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Contract-matched project site

#18 PIPEDOG: Low turnover makes recovery confirmation important

Awaiting confirmation
PIPEDOG daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 5.9/10; raw model fit 5.02/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -2.70% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of -0.02 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.002414 USDT; SMA7 0.0024892857; SMA8 0.00248825. Seven-day closing drawdown was 10.58%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 62,878 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:35.992231Z, spread was 15.86 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 357/59 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-07-29T01:26:53Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 30 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identityROBINHOOD · 0x5Cb6F181081301b44905F3ae15419112ecaBd8A6
Project / productThe reviewed official evidence identifies a Meme+ token and its network. A contract-matched business product, reliable team disclosure or token value-capture specification was not established.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsPrioritize contract permissions and independently verifiable LP custody. Its low observed turnover can make a sentiment reversal costly even if the displayed spread is currently acceptable.

Verify: Official listing announcement

#19 ALIGN: A modest decline with limited trading capacity

Awaiting confirmation
ALIGN daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Supply schedule documented; usage economics need proof. Track paid proofs, fees and production integrations alongside the cliff exposure. A positive product story must overcome, not conceal, concentrated future supply.

Relative rating 5.7/10; raw model fit 4.99/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -4.81% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of -2.13 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.006712 USDT; SMA7 0.0066572857; SMA8 0.0067065. Seven-day closing drawdown was 16.61%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 90,352 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:39.196096Z, spread was 15.87 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 122/195 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-20T03:58:09Z. The chart contains 27 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Project / productAligned develops Ethereum infrastructure including proof verification/aggregation and financial-application tooling. The business thesis is lower integration and verification costs for production customers.
Token demand and value captureALIGN is presented as the ecosystem token, but this review does not establish a shareholder-like revenue claim. Inspect which deployed services require the token and how fee demand compares with incentives.
Supply, dilution and unlocksThe April 2026 update states 10 billion total and about 16% circulating at TGE, not today. Team 23.50% plus investors 19.71% total 43.21%; those allocations have a 12-month cliff, then 40% release and 18-month remaining vesting. Calendar dates require the actual TGE anchor.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsProject disclosures distinguish mainnet beta verification from mainnet alpha aggregation. These stages should not be described as fully mature audited business performance; paid proof demand and customer retention remain unverified.
Team, control and security gapsProof-system, service-administration and implementation risks remain. A published supply schedule is useful evidence, but not proof that wallets follow it or that the token is undervalued.

Verify: Official listing announcement · Aligned April tokenomics update · Aligned product site

#20 FONE: A deep pullback keeps this a recovery observation

Awaiting confirmation
FONE daily closing-price path and reported quote turnover on MEXC
Each chart has its own vertical scale. First displayed close = 100; dates are UTC. It is context, not a return forecast. Chart data (JSON)

Fundamental verdict: Limited fundamental evidence. Treat as high-risk observation. Strengthen the thesis only with contract-matched utility, supply and security evidence; price momentum alone cannot fill those gaps.

Relative rating 5.5/10; raw model fit 4.89/10. Recovery watch; wait for trend repair. Over the same seven-day period, price changed -6.21% versus BTC -2.68%: a difference of -3.53 percentage points.

Technical evidence: final close 0.004182 USDT; SMA7 0.005715; SMA8 0.005558. Seven-day closing drawdown was 39.70%. The extension deduction is 0.00 points. A closing drawdown excludes intraday extremes and cannot cap a future loss.

Activity and execution: median daily quote turnover 290,936 USDT; 7/7 days reached 50,000 USDT. At 2026-09-17T15:39:41.506068Z, spread was 25.59 bps; observed bid/ask notional within 0.5% of mid was 3/45 USDT. The 100-level sample is a snapshot; incomplete bands are lower bounds, not guaranteed executable capacity.

Listing evidence: MEXC announcement published 2026-08-27T05:20:45Z. The source is labelled Meme+; verify contract identity and venue-specific restrictions particularly carefully. The chart contains 20 post-first-day closes; only its last eight closes and last seven turnover observations enter the model.

What is missing: the combination of a positive seven-day return and a close above SMA7. Wait for that repair and recheck liquidity; high relative rank alone does not resolve this weakness.

Fundamental dimensionEvidence and investment implication
Source-bound token identitySOL · CTPoyCwkjMvoJwU4xvZZqoD8tiYk6yDchySiN5gGpump
Project / productThis specific Solana Meme+ contract must not inherit mobile-network or telecom utility from unrelated FONE-named assets. No such product-to-token demand was established in the reviewed evidence.
Token demand and value captureA revenue entitlement or indispensable token use was not verified. This is not a claim that none exists; the available evidence cannot support it.
Supply, dilution and unlocksCurrent circulating supply, holder concentration and a validated vesting schedule were not established. No unlock calendar is interpreted as unknown, not zero future supply.
Adoption: evidence versus claimsThe exchange listing and market observations are verified at their stated times. Paying users, recurring business revenue and non-incentivized retention have not been independently measured.
Team, control and security gapsReconcile the exact issuer and contract before relying on any same-ticker project description. Mint/freeze authority, supply concentration and liquidity lock status remain unverified.

Verify: Official listing announcement

What this ranking cannot tell you

A newly listed market can rally despite being excluded for insufficient history; exclusion means the model cannot evaluate it comparably. Conversely, sufficient history and a narrow sampled spread do not establish safety. Low-cap and meme-labelled markets can suffer concentration, manipulation, sudden withdrawal changes or near-total losses.

Closed-price cutoff: 2026-09-17T00:00:00Z. Order books and active-market eligibility were observed afterward; each observation retains its real timestamp. This is a current mixed-time research release, not a point-in-time historical strategy replay. Seven-day scores are descriptive and have no prospective performance validation.

We do not have comparable active-buy fields across both exchange candle formats, so the score does not use CVD, net inflow, funding or OI. Fundamental source review is presented separately; it is not independent verification of circulating supply, team identity, deployed permissions or valuation. Missing information is not awarded points.

Download the evidence or use it in your own research

The JSON release includes all scores, per-coin input bars, exact components, identity checks and exclusions. Full public candle responses and order-book observations preserve acquisition time. CSV uses original numeric precision; table values are rounded only for readability.

To reproduce: filter each venue candle series using its announcement and cutoff, call calculate() from scoring.py with BTC closes, apply the saved order-book gate, resolve duplicates using identity_audit, sort raw scores, then compute strict-lower-count relative ratings. The SHA-256 manifest detects file changes, not the truth of an exchange feed.

This is a dated editorial edition, not a live ranking. New editions require refreshed evidence, reviewed per-coin explanations and tests before publication. Old release URLs remain stable. The next review target is September 24, 2026; no automatic ranking alert is promised.

Verify: Research JSON · Scores CSV · Candle inputs · Order-book inputs · SHA-256 manifest

Binance and MEXC listing evidence feeds a twenty-coin watchlist with separate trend and recovery states
Official listing evidence → comparable market data → scored watchlist → individual risk checks.

Take the next step with this evidence.

Reading about top 20 new crypto listings to watch? Choose ongoing notifications or a dataset you can inspect in your own research workflow.

Receive qualifying events in Telegram.

Use the ready-made alert checklist, message explanations and daily briefing. Check the supported categories and coins before subscribing; every Research page is not a separate alert category.

Check the alert list · View alert plans

Inspect the data before choosing a plan.

Market Events v1 connects recorded events and comparison rows with context, later outcomes and quality flags. Paid access provides customer API keys and daily JSON, CSV and Parquet files.

Check Market Events sample · Explore the full data catalog · Compare data plans

Researcher and Research Desk currently include Market Events v1 only, for its specified pairs and published history. This page's full dataset is not automatically included. Other data families require coverage, date, field and source-use confirmation before purchase. Telegram Pro and data access are separate subscriptions.

Frequently asked questions

Which new crypto should I watch now?

This September 17 edition ranks DGAI, CNPY and KII highest among 44 scored recent venue listings. Review their charts and risks before acting. The top 20 include 12 recovery observations and are not a list of guaranteed buys.

Are all these coins newly launched?

No. The criterion is an official listing announcement within the prior 90 days on Binance or MEXC. A token may have traded elsewhere for years. Venue listing, token creation and first global trading are different events.

Why are there more MEXC coins than Binance coins?

There is no exchange quota. Both sources face the same recent-announcement, closed-history, turnover and spread gates. The number of qualifying markets differs; the source and rejection ledger is public.

Does a 9.8-star score imply a 98% chance of profit?

No. Relative stars equal 10 times the fraction of the 44 scored assets with a strictly lower raw score. They are not calibrated probabilities, expected returns or project-safety ratings.

Why is a falling coin included?

The ranking combines activity, risk and relative momentum; it is an observation priority. A negative weekly return or a close below SMA7 is explicitly marked as a recovery watch, not a buy-ready signal.

Can I buy the same ticker on another exchange?

First verify the exact contract and network. Tickers can refer to different assets. This release measures a specific venue market; prices, liquidity and deposit compatibility can differ.

Can I reproduce the scores or obtain the dataset?

Yes. Public JSON, score and exclusion CSV, candle responses, order-book observations, scoring code and SHA-256 manifest are linked above. Paid data products have separate coverage and delivery terms.

Is this live, and will Telegram send every rank change?

No. This is a frozen September 17 editorial edition. The next review target is September 24. Telegram coverage follows the published alert checklist; automatic watchlist rank-change alerts are not included as a promised feature.

Do these ratings include fundamentals?

No. Stars and ordering retain the published technical formula. The separate fundamental review describes product utility, supply, adoption and risks without inventing a precise composite score. A high rank can coexist with weak fundamental evidence.

Which fundamental problems should I check first?

Reconcile DGAI team-vesting descriptions and CNPY supply figures; distinguish GRVT membership from revenue ownership and CAP from its deposit instruments. For Meme+ entries, verify exact contract identity, administrator permissions, holder concentration and liquidity before stronger conclusions.

Does missing unlock information mean a token has no selling pressure?

No. Unknown vesting or circulation is an evidence gap. Published maximum supply does not tell you how many tokens may become tradable next month. We do not fabricate zero unlocks or market-cap values.

Sources and verification

Monitor supported market events in Telegram.

Check alert coverage or explore research data delivery.

Explore alert coverage