Single-asset evidence report · By CoinNudge Research · · Guide updated 2026-10-03 · 20 min read
What is FET coin, and is it worth holding?
FET is a utility token associated with Fetch.ai and the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance. It can pay network fees and services and participate in staking; AI-company growth is not automatically tokenholder profit. For a holding decision, a FET holding case requires independently measured FET-denominated service demand and current post-merger supply, not the AI label or a pre-merger valuation comparison. In the frozen Binance spot daily-open window ending September 25, 2026, FET returned +28.6% versus BTC +40.5%; across 18 earlier monthly starts, its median was −21.0% and 6/18 beat BTC. Overlapping history is not a future win rate or personal buy call.
Inspect all historical starts · Check current market context
What should investors know about FET?
- FET gained +28.6% in the last frozen 90-day window; this differs from its historical monthly-start median −21.0%.
- 6/18 complete historical 90-day starts beat BTC, while 18/18 had a deeper daily-open drawdown.
- A FET holding case requires independently measured FET-denominated service demand and current post-merger supply, not the AI label or a pre-merger valuation comparison.
What is FET within the ASI Alliance, and what does it pay for?
FET is a utility token associated with Fetch.ai and the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance. It can pay network fees and services and participate in staking; AI-company growth is not automatically tokenholder profit.
FET is a utility token within the Fetch.ai/ASI ecosystem, not equity in an AI-model company. The network documentation distinguishes native FET from its ERC-20 form; the route matters when moving or staking balances.
A holding review should identify the service that actually needs FET, reconcile the current conversion-era supply and test historical price risk. The main monthly cohort below starts in January 2025 after the 2024 merger issuance; older archived candles are available but are not inserted into its 18 observations.
| FET at a glance | Dated evidence | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| Documented token role | Native/bridged token can pay documented network services and participate in staking | Not an automatic claim on every project activity |
| Last frozen 90-day spot return | +28.6% | BTC on the same UTC dates: +40.5% |
| Historical 90-day monthly median | −21.0% | 18 overlapping complete starts, not a forecast |
| Current circulating supply | 2,311,508,384 | CoinGecko response updated 2026-09-26T10:12:20.000Z |
Verify: Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
Do FET holders benefit when AI agents use the network?
FET can pay documented network services and fees and participate in staking, but ownership does not grant shares or automatic income from alliance organizations or their models.
A service customer paying FET, a validator receiving rewards and a passive wallet holder have distinct economics. Product demos show a possible use; they do not measure recurring independent paying customers or a distribution to all token holders.
Check whether the actual service requires FET, which form/network it accepts and who receives the payment. If a feature can be used without retained FET demand, its popularity cannot by itself be credited as tokenholder cash flow.
| Who owns what | Documented role or participation | What cannot be inferred |
|---|---|---|
| FET holder | Native/bridged token can pay documented network services and participate in staking | No equity in alliance organizations or model revenues |
| Network service user | Pays for services where the protocol requires FET | A product demo does not establish mass paid usage |
| Validator/delegator | May earn network rewards under live parameters | Nominal staking rewards may coexist with dilution and price losses |
Verify: Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
Which FET do you hold: native or ERC-20, and can you use it?
The network documentation distinguishes native FET and an Ethereum ERC-20 token. A familiar ticker alone is insufficient for deciding the destination network, conversion route or staking support.
Before sending or delegating, match the official network/token identifier with the wallet and venue instructions, then confirm any documented conversion procedure. A route mismatch is a reason to stop and verify support, not to assume identical tickers make addresses interchangeable.
The quoted Binance FET/USDT price history does not certify a particular self-custody transfer or later migration outcome. Route checks, any conversion costs and withdrawal availability must be completed separately; this report does not promise a current migration ratio beyond the attributed historical issuer notice.
Verify: Fetch.ai native and ERC-20 FET documentation · Historical ASI conversion issuance notice
Does AI-agent adoption create measurable demand for FET?
FET-required services can create token demand, but this release has not independently measured recurring paid AI demand or passive-holder income. The alliance merger also changed the supply denominator, so a pre-merger supply count cannot be combined with a current token price as an unchanged valuation.
Fetch.ai’s current network documentation says FET is used for network transaction fees, services and staking. This is a documented function; it does not measure how many independent customers buy or retain tokens for AI agents. The research test is dated paid service volume and fee flows, not a project announcement count.
The issuer announced 1,477,549,566 additional FET units in 2024 to support AGIX and OCEAN conversion. The raw multi-year FET/USDT candle archive spans that change, but this report's main monthly cohort is restricted to January 2025 onward. Quoted-unit spot returns are not an unchanged-capitalization or unchanged-supply valuation comparison. Alliance plans and realized token migration should not be silently treated as the same event.
The archived multi-year FET candles span the 2024 supply change; the main 18-start cohort does not. It is explicitly limited to January 2025 onward. Even that post-merger spot-price experiment is not a constant-supply valuation test or proof that fee-paying AI customers caused the return.
FET's dated price experiment below measures spot returns and drawdown paths, not the causal contribution of project adoption. The release has no independently frozen continuous operating-economics series that completes this value-capture test.
Verify: Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
How did the ASI merger and token conversions change FET supply?
The ASI merger added FET units for token conversion, so old supply denominators cannot be reused for a post-merger valuation. Planned conversions and actual circulating balances are separate; the main cohort is explicitly January 2025 onward.
CoinGecko’s separate 2026-09-26T10:12:20.000Z response reports 2,311,508,384 circulating FET out of 2,714,384,547 total and 2,714,384,547 maximum. These are provider classifications, not an audit of custodian balances or a schedule of future exchange selling.
The 2024 alliance merger increased FET supply for token conversion; later ecosystem integrations and actual circulating supply require current reconciliation. The provider snapshot is a dated estimate and must not be presented as the original fixed supply. This report limits its 90-day monthly-start cohort to 2025 onward to keep the comparison within one post-merger regime; archived pre-2025 candles remain downloadable but are excluded from that cohort.
For FET, reconcile conversion-related issuance, completed migrations and current balances before comparing market values. The announced conversion amounts do not themselves certify today's circulating float. Compare price times a supply count from the same date and regime; do not use a pre-merger denominator with a post-merger quote. Missing migration attribution remains unknown rather than an estimated sale date.
| FET supply field | Frozen provider value | Reading rule |
|---|---|---|
| Circulating supply | 2,311,508,384 | CoinGecko provider definition at 2026-09-26T10:12:20.000Z |
| Total supply | 2,714,384,547 | May differ from circulating and maximum supply |
| Maximum supply | 2,714,384,547 | Missing is not zero and not equal to total supply |
| Reported circulating / maximum | 85.2% | Not a dated release schedule or tradable-float audit |
Verify: Frozen original supply response · Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
FET tokenomics after the ASI merger: conversion, staking and supply
FET supply comparisons must account for the ASI conversion: the cited Fetch.ai notice describes additional issuance for token migration, so the pre-merger denominator cannot be treated as unchanged. FET network fees, services and staking are distinct from an equity claim on AI companies or an automatic share of their revenue.
Check the native or ERC token identity, completed conversion balances, current supply and staking issuance before comparing market capitalisations across regimes. Keep an announced migration separate from one actually completed by the relevant venue. Paid services requiring FET are stronger demand evidence than an AI partnership headline alone.
| Token-economics dimension | Documented mechanism or attributed claim | What remains unproven / investor implication |
|---|---|---|
| Alliance-era supply | Fetch.ai announced 1,477,549,566 additional FET units in 2024 to support AGIX/OCEAN token conversion. | Old pre-merger supply cannot be treated as the unchanged current denominator. |
| Migration and distribution | The ASI alliance combined token communities through conversion and later integrations. | A planned migration ratio and actual distributed supply need separate dated checks. |
| Use and rights | FET pays documented network fees/services and can be staked. | AI-project revenue or model usage is not automatic equity-like cash flow to passive holders. |
| Investor check | Verify current total/circulating units, migrated balances, paid FET-required services and staking issuance. | Multi-year price-only comparisons cross a supply regime change. |
Verify: Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai network token utility
How did FET perform after the token merger over 7 to 365 days?
At the September 25 UTC daily-open endpoint, FET returned +28.6% over 90 days versus BTC +40.5% on exactly the same days. The 365-day FET path was −61.3% versus BTC −25.5%. These different windows are one dated path each—not five independent tests or a prediction.
The 90-day chart plots all 91 matched UTC daily opens from 2026-06-27 to 2026-09-25, normalized to 100 on the first day. A later CoinGecko price or 24-hour change may differ because the venue, market window and timestamp differ. The table reports the actual shared-start comparison rather than mixing unrelated provider percentages.
| Matched holding window | FET spot return | BTC spot return | FET minus BTC / status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +31.2% | +10.5% | 20.8 pp |
| 30 days | +40.4% | +7.5% | 32.9 pp |
| 90 days | +28.6% | +40.5% | -11.9 pp |
| 180 days | −3.4% | +27.2% | -30.6 pp |
| 365 days | −61.3% | −25.5% | -35.8 pp |
Verify: Full dated path and methods
After the supply change, how did FET compare with BTC over 90 days?
Across the frozen matched 90-day monthly starts, FET's median return was −21.0% versus BTC −5.4%, and 6/18 starts beat BTC. That is descriptive historical evidence, not a future success probability; the full overlapping sample, dependence check and opposing cases appear below.
We prespecified every first day of a month from 2025-01-01 (after the token-merger supply change) through June 2026. Of 18 candidate 90-day starts, 18 had a complete 91-daily-open FET/BTC pair and 0 were excluded for missing daily opens. The FET median endpoint was −21.0%, BTC's was −5.4%; FET beat BTC in 6/18. Those windows overlap and must not be treated as 18 independent win-probability trials.
FET had a deeper daily-open peak-to-trough drawdown in 18/18 matched windows. The lower 10th-percentile FET endpoint was −61.1% and the upper 90th percentile +38.2%. Every-third-month sensitivity has only 6 observations and 2 BTC-beating starts; it is a dependence check, not a statistically powered forecast.
The worst BTC-relative start was 2025-08-01: −60.9% for FET against −5.0% BTC, with −68.5% asset drawdown. A counterexample is 2026-03-01: +55.9% for FET versus +9.7% BTC. Showing both prevents the current rally or a past collapse from becoming the whole story.
| 90-day monthly cohort measure | FET | BTC / paired comparison | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete starts | 18 | 18 | Same UTC dates and 91 daily opens |
| Median endpoint | −21.0% | −5.4% | Not an expected future return |
| 10th / 90th percentile | −61.1% / +38.2% | −23.0% / +25.2% | Descriptive tail range |
| Outperformed BTC | 6/18 | — | Overlapping monthly windows |
| Deeper path drawdown | 18/18 | — | Measured at daily opens only |
| Every-third-month check | 2/6 | — | Small non-overlap sensitivity |
Verify: All matched starts and excluded candidates · Frozen calculation contract
Which of the 18 post-merger FET entry months actually beat BTC?
Both winning and losing FET windows are shown: all 18 eligible same-date FET/BTC 90-day observations are visible chronologically below. The worst BTC-relative start was 2025-08-01: −60.9% for FET against −5.0% BTC, with −68.5% asset drawdown. A counterexample is 2026-03-01: +55.9% for FET versus +9.7% BTC. These are contrasting examples from the complete table, not independent future scenarios. A first-of-month start is the frozen sample design, not a suggested buying schedule.
Compare terminal return with interim drawdown in each row. Daily-open paths can understate intraday harm; fees, spreads, slippage, tax, staking and leverage are excluded. The complete input CSV and exclusion ledger are available for independent recalculation.
| UTC start | FET 90d | BTC 90d | FET − BTC | FET path drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-01 | −64.3% | −11.8% | -52.5 pp | −71.8% |
| 2025-02-01 | −28.8% | −5.8% | -23.0 pp | −63.1% |
| 2025-03-01 | +30.6% | +25.2% | +5.4 pp | −49.3% |
| 2025-04-01 | +56.8% | +31.3% | +25.6 pp | −36.2% |
| 2025-05-01 | −3.8% | +25.3% | -29.0 pp | −36.2% |
| 2025-06-01 | −18.3% | +3.6% | -21.9 pp | −29.0% |
| 2025-07-01 | −14.5% | +4.7% | -19.1 pp | −33.5% |
| 2025-08-01 | −60.9% | −5.0% | -55.9 pp | −68.5% |
| 2025-09-01 | −57.7% | −16.1% | -41.5 pp | −69.6% |
| 2025-10-01 | −61.7% | −23.5% | -38.1 pp | −67.8% |
| 2025-11-01 | −10.1% | −22.8% | +12.7 pp | −46.6% |
| 2025-12-01 | −38.7% | −25.9% | -12.8 pp | −49.8% |
| 2026-01-01 | +16.8% | −22.1% | +38.9 pp | −52.2% |
| 2026-02-01 | +5.6% | −0.6% | +6.2 pp | −24.9% |
| 2026-03-01 | +55.9% | +9.7% | +46.2 pp | −27.2% |
| 2026-04-01 | −23.7% | −11.8% | -11.9 pp | −39.6% |
| 2026-05-01 | −29.6% | −16.2% | -13.4 pp | −50.6% |
| 2026-06-01 | −44.5% | +6.2% | -50.7 pp | −55.7% |
Is FET market depth sufficient beyond headline trading volume?
A quoted FET price does not guarantee your order can buy or exit there. This report has one dated Binance order-book sample, separate from historical daily turnover; execution requires a fresh route-specific book and cost check.
The historical FET/USDT Binance spot candles show $11,468,898 median daily quote turnover across 30 complete UTC days. This is a transaction-flow measure, not cash available at a specific bid or ask. It also excludes other exchanges and market-maker obligations.
A separate CoinNudge Binance book sample observed at 2026-09-26T10:11:10.139Z shows 4.16 bps quoted spread and $439,409 returned depth within ±1% of mid. The modelled $10,000 buy slippage is 6.18 bps before fees and latency. Recheck the live book and your actual venue; this is one snapshot, not guaranteed execution.
Before an actual FET order, match the pair, venue and observation time, then estimate the buy from asks and the planned exit from bids at the intended size. Add fees and any transfer costs; one basis point is 0.01%. If the returned levels cannot fill the size, or access/data is delayed, reduce the planned exposure or wait for adequate evidence—not extrapolate the historical turnover into depth.
| Liquidity or execution measure | Dated observed value | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| 30-day Binance spot median daily quote turnover | $11,468,898 | 30 complete archived UTC days; turnover ≠ executable depth |
| Sampled bid/ask spread | 4.16 bps | One Binance book observation; can change by the second |
| Visible depth within ±1% of mid | $439,409 | Returned 500 levels per side only |
| Simulated $10k buy / sell slippage | 6.18 / 4.39 bps | Excludes fees, latency and later book changes |
Verify: Frozen top-30 order-book source · Current market-depth research
Is FET attention about paid AI use or the broader AI-token story?
FET attention can concern paid AI services, conversion logistics or an AI-sector price narrative; these are different kinds of evidence. A holding thesis needs token-required, dated economic activity rather than a general prediction about AI adoption.
Search-trending lists and public discussions show attention to FET at the September 26 review. The cited lists are dynamic, and this release did not freeze a defensible unique-person or social-mention count. Attention is not a count of buyers, tokenholder rights or durable usage.
FET has attracted attention during recent AI-token rotations. Search-trending rankings change within hours, so distinguish discussion of actual deployed paid agents from broad sector price excitement and conversion/migration questions.
To use FET discussion constructively, choose one factual claim, follow its direct source, note the date and beneficiary, and compare it with the rights and supply checks in this report. An unsupported promotion remains attention evidence; it is not converted into a holder-benefit claim or buying score.
Verify: Cross-platform social directory · CoinGecko short-window search attention · Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
Is FET worth holding without proven token capture from AI services?
There is no unconditional yes from this evidence. A FET holding case requires independently measured FET-denominated service demand and current post-merger supply, not the AI label or a pre-merger valuation comparison. The last frozen 90-day return was +28.6%, while the median of 18 earlier monthly-start windows was −21.0%; 6/18 beat BTC. These overlapping historical paths describe risk, not the chance of a profitable hold from today.
Evidence that would strengthen a holding thesis: Auditable paid AI service use and token fee demand grow relative to issuance, with completed migrations and liquid exchange markets. Evidence that would weaken or end it: The AI narrative raises price without measured FET-required usage, or migration/supply complexity makes old valuation comparisons misleading.
A holder should state a time horizon, position size, acceptable drawdown and specific facts that would trigger a reassessment. Revision trigger for this report: A new token migration, supply expansion, fee mechanism or independently audited service-use series changes the thesis. The checklist is not a personal recommendation, target price or promise that the next 90 days resemble a prior cohort.
Before a FET exposure, confirm the native or ERC-20 route, destination support and the applicable conversion or staking terms. If identity or balances cannot be reconciled across the migration, stop the transfer and resolve the route; do not use an old ticker price as evidence of equivalent market value. If the investment thesis requires paid FET services but no paid-use series is evidenced, retain it as an unconfirmed condition rather than an established revenue driver.
| Holding decision check | Evidence to verify | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Tokenholder benefit | Native/bridged token can pay documented network services and participate in staking | No equity in alliance organizations or model revenues |
| Future tradable supply | Official allocation dates and actual transfers | Provider float alone is not a sell forecast |
| Ability to exit | Fresh bid/ask depth plus fees and latency | Historical turnover is not a fill guarantee |
| Opportunity cost versus BTC | 18 complete historical paired starts plus current common window | Absolute gains can still lag BTC |
| Thesis invalidation | A new token migration, supply expansion, fee mechanism or independently audited service-use series changes the thesis. | A stated reason to reassess is more useful than an indefinite hold slogan |
Verify: Frozen FET/BTC price study · Complete FET monthly observation ledger · Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
Why does this FET study exclude pre-merger monthly entry points?
Pre-merger FET entry dates are outside this study's January 2025 onward cohort because the 2024 merger changed the supply regime; they are not zero-return or missing-data observations. Reproduce the 18 post-merger starts from the matched daily inputs, full CSV and frozen JSON. The October 3, 2026 edit clarifies the protocol without recalculating it.
Calculation hot-coin-spot-paths-1.0; historical cutoff 2026-09-25 UTC. The archived candle ledger preserves event_time, observed_at and ingested_at. Historical fills may have been collected retrospectively; this study does not claim every bar was available to CoinNudge on its original event date.
Recent returns use the same UTC daily-open start and endpoint for FET and BTC with every intermediate day present. The monthly study begins at 2025-01-01; pre-merger dates are outside the defined cohort, not zero-return cases. It then buys at the first-day open and exits at the day-90 open, with 91 complete daily opens per pair; maximum drawdown is min(path / prior running peak − 1). It assumes no costs or dividends. The asset and BTC daily input CSVs enable independent numerical replay. Candidate and exclusion counts, input SHA-256 1b0f8db1044d54dd8dc6080dd37da0b5262bd7f2cc17a81b65c1a644457131fb of the complete normalized archive objects, and output SHA-256 8ae2d6eb0c6f8d3d434a758da14d34ebe63624414e73d15b6959615152b356bc of the research result identify the frozen release; the manifest separately hashes each downloadable file.
Supply comes from a separate CoinGecko 2026-09-26T10:12:20.000Z observation; the separate book package was generated at 2026-09-26T10:14:13.653Z, while the FET row was observed at 2026-09-26T10:11:10.139Z. Neither is silently inserted as information known to historical cohort investors. No causal claim links community activity or project usage to later return.
| Reproducible file | Contents | Time/interpretation boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Research JSON | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/fet.json | Calculation version, summary and full paired cohort |
| Observation CSV | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/fet-monthly-observations.csv | 18 matched monthly starts |
| Asset daily inputs | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/fet-daily-inputs.csv | Event, observation and ingestion dates |
| BTC daily inputs | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/btc-daily-inputs.csv | Matched BTC daily opens and provenance |
| Excluded starts | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/fet-exclusions.csv | 0 missing pairs; header retained if zero |
| Supply source | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/coingecko-supply-source.json | Dated provider fields, not a historical feature |
| Order-book source | /research-data/hot-coin-profiles/2026-09-26-v1/orderbook-source.json | Sampled current market, may omit this asset |
Verify: CoinNudge frozen spot-path research · Complete monthly observation ledger · Daily historical input ledger · Matched BTC daily input ledger · Frozen CoinGecko supply response · Dated order-book source · Social directory and limitations · Fetch.ai native FET documentation · Fetch.ai merger supply notice · Fetch.ai alliance integration notice
Take the next step with this evidence.
Choose ongoing Telegram monitoring or inspect structured data in your own research workflow.
Receive qualifying events in Telegram.
Use the ready-made alert checklist, message explanations and daily briefing. Check the supported categories and coins before subscribing; every Research page is not a separate alert category.
Check the alert list · View alert plans
Inspect the data before choosing a pack.
Prepared research packs supply scoped features, separate outcomes where available and quality flags. Buy a fixed edition once and download directly; API use is optional.
Check data pack samples · Explore the full data catalog · Compare data plans
Each purchased pack includes its specified fields and published date range. This page's full dataset is not automatically included. Other data families require coverage, date, field and source-use confirmation before purchase. Telegram Pro is a separate 30-day service; historical packs are one-time purchases.
Frequently asked questions
What is Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) used for?
FET is a utility token associated with Fetch.ai and the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance. It can pay network fees and services and participate in staking; AI-company growth is not automatically tokenholder profit. This answers the token's documented role, not whether its price is attractive.
Is FET worth holding?
There is no unconditional yes in this dated research. A FET holding case requires independently measured FET-denominated service demand and current post-merger supply, not the AI label or a pre-merger valuation comparison. The historical 18 monthly 90-day starts overlap, and 6/18 beat BTC; this is not a future success rate. Check your own horizon, loss limit and live evidence before deciding.
Is FET a good coin to buy now?
This report is not a personalized buy call. The latest dated 90-day FET path was +28.6% versus BTC +40.5%, but only 6/18 earlier 90-day monthly starts beat BTC and rights, supply and execution still matter.
How has FET performed over 7, 30, 90 and 365 days?
The matched Binance spot daily-open returns are 7 days +31.2%; 30 days +40.4%; 90 days +28.6%; 365 days −61.3% through September 25, 2026. These are dated historical windows, not live quotes.
Is FET the same as owning an AI company?
No. FET utility and company equity are separate.
Why did FET supply change during the ASI merger?
The issuer minted additional tokens to support AGIX and OCEAN conversion; see its published migration notice.
Can pre-merger and current FET market caps be compared from price alone?
No. Supply and token-unit history must be aligned first.
Can I reproduce this FET study?
Yes. The page exposes every 18 matched 90-day start, the daily input CSV, exclusions, version and hashes. The windows overlap, so observed counts are not independent future probabilities.
Does FET trading volume guarantee easy execution?
No. The 30-day Binance spot turnover is separate from one sampled order book. At the cited snapshot the returned ±1% book depth was $439,409; later depth and actual fills can differ.
Does the FET monthly study span the 2024 supply merger?
No. The main cohort starts January 2025 and contains 18 complete post-merger 90-day starts. The downloadable older candle archive spans the supply change but is outside that defined cohort.
Can I send FET using any network because the ticker matches?
No. Confirm native or ERC-20 identity and the destination's supported network and conversion instructions before transferring. A spot ticker does not certify wallet compatibility.
What are FET tokenomics?
FET utility includes network fees, services and staking, but the 2024 alliance conversion involved substantial additional issuance. Historical price and current valuation need supply-adjusted context; AI adoption alone does not establish tokenholder income.
Sources and verification
- CoinNudge frozen spot-path researchMatched daily-open returns, full cohort and audit hashes.
- Complete monthly observation ledgerEvery eligible 90-day matched start.
- Daily historical input ledgerActual daily inputs with observation and ingestion time.
- Matched BTC daily input ledgerThe same-date BTC opens used in every paired return and drawdown.
- Frozen CoinGecko supply responseProvider-defined current float, total and maximum supply at its own timestamp.
- Dated order-book sourceSampled Binance books for covered markets; not the entire exchange.
- Social directory and limitationsDirectional 7-day X and 30-day Reddit mention counts; bot and promotion filtering unverified.
- Fetch.ai native FET documentationNetwork use and staking, distinct from corporate equity.
- Fetch.ai merger supply noticeAdditional tokens and conversion rationale.
- Fetch.ai alliance integration noticeAlliance utility claim and integration scope.
Monitor FET market changes without treating a dated report as a current order.
Use this report for the thesis and risk checks, then verify current liquidity and any alert separately.
Preview Telegram alert coverage